Pues esa cabina esta bien avanzada hay que admitir la verdad.
Cuando van a dejar toda la flota a este nivel?
Sera que no se puede conseguir aunque sea un TC-2 biplaza?
La electronica del Kfir y su panel de armas es buena, sus bombas,.misiles aire aire y aire.tierra son de buena calidad, en modo de ataque a tierra es un avion aun letal con todo lo que puede llevar, y en su modo aire aire.tiene buenos misiles y radar, pero esta claro que la Fac necesita repartir roles, y el F 16 o el que venga tiene la labor de un caza e interceptor, sin que el Kfir deje de hacerlo, pero en combate real el Kfir sera un buen complemento junto con las alertas tempranas y misiles de tierra aire cuando se consolide el Sisdan, que como.tortuga avanza pero alli va, firme
el problema del Kfir no es la electrónica es el diseño anticuado y el motor y por mucho chechere electrónico o arma de ultima tecnología que le metan eso no va a cambiar.
el problema del Kfir no es la electrónica es el diseño anticuado y el motor y por mucho chechere electrónico o arma de ultima tecnología que le metan eso no va a cambiar.
el problema del Kfir no es la electrónica es el diseño anticuado y el motor y por mucho chechere electrónico o arma de ultima tecnología que le metan eso no va a cambiar.
Eso lo sabe todo el foro!
pues no parece, pues con unas cuantas imágenes de la cabina del Kfir mas de uno se descresta y a lo mejor todavía hay alguien en el foro que no posee su omnisciencia
el problema del Kfir no es la electrónica es el diseño anticuado y el motor y por mucho chechere electrónico o arma de ultima tecnología que le metan eso no va a cambiar.
ese es el talon de aquiles del Kfir tanto es asi que en los 80/90 IAI ofrecia un aparato que solucionaba parte de estos problemas con un nuevo motor , no el sediento J79 si no el GE404 o otros modelos .
The IAI Nammer (נמר "Leopard", but also in Hebrew meaning "Tiger") was a fighter aircraft developed in Israel in the late 1980s and early 1990s as a modernised version of the Kfir for the export market. Although a prototype was built and flown, buyers were not forthcoming and development was ceased without any further examples being constructed. The avionics of the Nammer were to have taken advantage of the work undertaken for the cancelled Lavi project.
Design and development
As initially announced, the Nammer was to be an upgrade package for existing Mirage III and Mirage 5 airframes. Customers would be offered a choice of two configurations, one based around re-engining the aircraft with a General Electric F404, the other around retaining the Mirage's SNECMA Atar engine but integrating the Elta EL/M-2011 or EL/M-2032 fire-control radar. The first of these options maximised performance and range, the second maximised the aircraft's air-to-air targeting capabilities. As development progressed, the Nammer came to be advertised as a new-build aircraft with the EL/M-2032 an integral part of the package, and customers able to choose their preferred engine out of the F404 (or its Volvo derivative, the RM-12), the SNECMA M53, or the Pratt & Whitney PW1120. The design strongly resembled the Kfir C-7,but was easily distinguished by its longer nose and lack of a dorsal air scoop under the tail fin. The asking price was $US 20 million, and IAI stated that it would not commence production without orders for 80 aircraft.
Comentarios
Creditos a su Autor
Saludos Cordiales
Por esto prefiero tumblr:
Saludos Cordiales
Saludos Cordiales
Nope, la cabina de nuestros C-10/C/TC-12
Saludos
Cuando van a dejar toda la flota a este nivel?
Sera que no se puede conseguir aunque sea un TC-2 biplaza?
Eso lo sabe todo el foro!
pues no parece, pues con unas cuantas imágenes de la cabina del Kfir mas de uno se descresta y a lo mejor todavía hay alguien en el foro que no posee su omnisciencia
ese es el talon de aquiles del Kfir tanto es asi que en los 80/90 IAI ofrecia un aparato que solucionaba parte de estos problemas con un nuevo motor , no el sediento J79 si no el GE404 o otros modelos .
The IAI Nammer (נמר "Leopard", but also in Hebrew meaning "Tiger") was a fighter aircraft developed in Israel in the late 1980s and early 1990s as a modernised version of the Kfir for the export market. Although a prototype was built and flown, buyers were not forthcoming and development was ceased without any further examples being constructed. The avionics of the Nammer were to have taken advantage of the work undertaken for the cancelled Lavi project.
Design and development
As initially announced, the Nammer was to be an upgrade package for existing Mirage III and Mirage 5 airframes. Customers would be offered a choice of two configurations, one based around re-engining the aircraft with a General Electric F404, the other around retaining the Mirage's SNECMA Atar engine but integrating the Elta EL/M-2011 or EL/M-2032 fire-control radar. The first of these options maximised performance and range, the second maximised the aircraft's air-to-air targeting capabilities. As development progressed, the Nammer came to be advertised as a new-build aircraft with the EL/M-2032 an integral part of the package, and customers able to choose their preferred engine out of the F404 (or its Volvo derivative, the RM-12), the SNECMA M53, or the Pratt & Whitney PW1120. The design strongly resembled the Kfir C-7,but was easily distinguished by its longer nose and lack of a dorsal air scoop under the tail fin. The asking price was $US 20 million, and IAI stated that it would not commence production without orders for 80 aircraft.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAI_Nammer
Saludos Cordiales
Howdy, Stranger!
RegistrarseIt looks like you've been lurking for a while.
If you register, we will remember what you have read and notify you about new comments. You will also be able to participate in discussions.
So if you'd like to get involved, register for an account, it'll only take you a minute!