Quisiera saber porqué si los japoneses derribaron el misil, no lo hicieron público? Qué de secretismo tiene eso? De ser así el gordo no estaría yendose lance en ristre contra los japoneses.

Cuántos satélites no habrían visto ese derribo... Nadie los publica?...

Le diré que es lo que hacen y ya hay antecedentes de eso.

"TheSeoul Economic Daily reports the missile travelled 48 kilometres before officials detonated it over fears it was fired at Russia by accident."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/north-korea-ballistic-missile-russia-failed-detonated-seoul-economic-daily-viktor-ozerov-a7714551.html

North Korea’s New ICBM

July 6, 2017

Q1: What did North Korea launch?



A1: North Korea conducted a flight test of an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) that it has designated the Hwasong-14. During the July 3 test, the Hwasong-14 traveled for around 40 minutes before landing in the Sea of Japan, inside Japan’s exclusive economic zone. The missile was launched on a highly lofted trajectory to an altitude of about 2,800 kilometers and traveled some 930 kilometers in distance. Had the same motor’s thrust been put to a range-maximizing flight path, the Hwasong-14 could have traveled as far as 7,000 kilometers, enough to reach Alaska and well in range of Guam. If fired in an eastward direction to take advantage of the rotation of the earth, the Hwasong-14 could potentially reach up to 8,000 kilometers, putting Hawaii at risk. The missile appears to employ at least two stages and operates on liquid fuel.

Q2: How significant is this event?



A2: This launch represents North Korea’s first-ever test of a true ICBM. An ICBM is classified as a ballistic missile that can deliver a warhead to a range of 5,500 kilometers or more. The definition was set during the Cold War, as 5,500 kilometers is approximately the minimum distance between contiguous Russian and U.S. territories.

https://www.csis.org/analysis/north-korea’s-new-icbm

El de hoy fué aún más exitoso según fuentes.

Pruebas de mar del Victoria.

No lo se, parece que existe la categoría de "LIGHT APC", al menos eso nos dice Renault Trucks.

Sherpa Light APC is an armoured transport vehicle, able to carry up to 10 men and their equipment. The large internal volume of APC allows equipping the vehicle with any weapon system. It is particularly suitable for troop transport, internal security missions and counter-terrorism missions and can serve as a command post or as an ambulance.

http://www.renault-trucks-defense.eu/Defense/SHERPA-LIGHT/APC

Comparado con el HUNTER, encuentro que son vehículos muy similares en especificaciones y que actúan en los mismos TO.

josh dijo: Avibras Sky-Fire70 M1 y M2. Hay también -al parecer- de un segundo proveedor. 

Me lo suponía, por lo que se sabe el cohete thor indumil de 70 mm aún estaba muy prematuro. Y pues qué bueno que sea con AVIBRAS, muy probablemente se puedan producir bajo licencia (diría que es casi obligatorio).